Vijay Kothapalli v. Nicole Borden

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-11786

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

VIJAY KOTHAPALLI, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NICOLE BORDEN,

Defendant-Appellant,

ALL OTHERS,

Defendants.

____________________

2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-11786

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 2:24-cv-00105-RWS

____________________

Before JORDAN, JILL PYROR, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Vijay Kothapalli’s motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction is GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. Nicole Borden, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s order remanding the case to state court. We lack jurisdiction to review the remand order because it was based on the district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)-(d); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997); Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Humana Med Plan, Inc., 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001).

Kothapalli’s motion for sanctions is DENIED and all other pending motions are DENIED as MOOT.