Vijay Kothapalli v. Nicole Borden
This text of Vijay Kothapalli v. Nicole Borden (Vijay Kothapalli v. Nicole Borden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 24-11786 Document: 17-1 Date Filed: 11/05/2024 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 24-11786 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
VIJAY KOTHAPALLI, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NICOLE BORDEN,
Defendant-Appellant,
ALL OTHERS,
Defendants.
____________________ USCA11 Case: 24-11786 Document: 17-1 Date Filed: 11/05/2024 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 24-11786
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 2:24-cv-00105-RWS ____________________
Before JORDAN, JILL PYROR, and NEWSOM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Vijay Kothapalli’s motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction is GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. Nicole Borden, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s order remanding the case to state court. We lack jurisdiction to review the remand order because it was based on the district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)-(d); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997); Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Humana Med Plan, Inc., 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001). Kothapalli’s motion for sanctions is DENIED and all other pending motions are DENIED as MOOT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vijay Kothapalli v. Nicole Borden, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vijay-kothapalli-v-nicole-borden-ca11-2024.