Viguerie v. Viguerie

63 So. 89, 133 La. 406, 1913 La. LEXIS 2055
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 28, 1913
DocketNo. 19,791
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 63 So. 89 (Viguerie v. Viguerie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Viguerie v. Viguerie, 63 So. 89, 133 La. 406, 1913 La. LEXIS 2055 (La. 1913).

Opinions

On Motion to Dismiss the Appeal.

BREAUX, C. J.

The grounds are that plaintiff sequestered a number of barrels of molasses of her husband.

The creditor of plaintiff’s' husband, who had the molasses in his possession, under a forthcoming bond, filed an exception to dissolve the sequestration, which was sustained, and the sequestration dissolved and the property delivered to the Sugar Planters’ Storage & Distributing Company, plaintiff in motion to dissolve.

Mrs. Ernestine L. Viguerie, plaintiff in the suit in which the writ of sequestration was issued, obtained an order of suspensive, and in the alternative, of devolutive appeal. The court fixed the bond on either appeal at $100.

The property sequestered is worth about $3,000.

[1] The complaint is that the amount of the.bond was not sufficient, and should have been fixed in the amount required, by the Code of Practice.

This motion has no merit.

The question was thoroughly considered [409]*409in Fitzpatrick v. Letten, 123 La. 754, 49 South. 494, 17 Ann. Cas. 197. We held that the court has discretion in fixing the amount of a bond if plaintiff’s action is nonsuited, and defendant not condemned to 'pay anything.

See, also, on the same subject, Day v. Bailey et al, 116 La. 961, 41 South. 223.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Miller
102 So. 2d 52 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1957)
Carter v. Third Dist. Homestead Ass'n
197 So. 230 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1940)
Bultman v. Wood
168 So. 384 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1936)
Palmer v. Edwards
155 So. 483 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1934)
Jefferson v. Gamm
90 So. 682 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1922)
Louisiana Land & Immigration Co. v. Murff
72 So. 284 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1916)
Coguenhem v. Himalaya Planting & Mfg. Co.
73 So. 301 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 So. 89, 133 La. 406, 1913 La. LEXIS 2055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viguerie-v-viguerie-la-1913.