Viguerie v. Viguerie
This text of 63 So. 89 (Viguerie v. Viguerie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
On Motion to Dismiss the Appeal.
The grounds are that plaintiff sequestered a number of barrels of molasses of her husband.
The creditor of plaintiff’s' husband, who had the molasses in his possession, under a forthcoming bond, filed an exception to dissolve the sequestration, which was sustained, and the sequestration dissolved and the property delivered to the Sugar Planters’ Storage & Distributing Company, plaintiff in motion to dissolve.
Mrs. Ernestine L. Viguerie, plaintiff in the suit in which the writ of sequestration was issued, obtained an order of suspensive, and in the alternative, of devolutive appeal. The court fixed the bond on either appeal at $100.
The property sequestered is worth about $3,000.
This motion has no merit.
The question was thoroughly considered [409]*409in Fitzpatrick v. Letten, 123 La. 754, 49 South. 494, 17 Ann. Cas. 197. We held that the court has discretion in fixing the amount of a bond if plaintiff’s action is nonsuited, and defendant not condemned to 'pay anything.
See, also, on the same subject, Day v. Bailey et al, 116 La. 961, 41 South. 223.
Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
63 So. 89, 133 La. 406, 1913 La. LEXIS 2055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viguerie-v-viguerie-la-1913.