Viguerie Co. v. Paterson

467 N.E.2d 528, 62 N.Y.2d 871, 478 N.Y.S.2d 864, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4416
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 7, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 467 N.E.2d 528 (Viguerie Co. v. Paterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Viguerie Co. v. Paterson, 467 N.E.2d 528, 62 N.Y.2d 871, 478 N.Y.S.2d 864, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4416 (N.Y. 1984).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (94 AD2d 672), to which we add, the inhibiting effect of which petitioner complains is precisely what the Legislature intended and is well within its police power.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

National Awareness Foundation v. Robert Abrams
50 F.3d 1159 (Second Circuit, 1995)
National Awareness Foundation v. Abrams
50 F.3d 1159 (Second Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
467 N.E.2d 528, 62 N.Y.2d 871, 478 N.Y.S.2d 864, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viguerie-co-v-paterson-ny-1984.