Viguerie Co. v. Paterson

467 N.E.2d 528, 62 N.Y.2d 871, 478 N.Y.S.2d 864, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4416
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 7, 1984·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (94 AD2d 672), to which we add, the inhibiting effect of which petitioner complains is precisely what the Legislature intended and is well within its police power.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Viguerie Co. v. Paterson, 467 N.E.2d 528, 62 N.Y.2d 871, 478 N.Y.S.2d 864, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4416 (N.Y. 1984).

467 N.E.2d 528 (Viguerie Co. v. Paterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Awareness Foundation v. Robert Abrams
50 F.3d 1159 (Second Circuit, 1995)
National Awareness Foundation v. Abrams
50 F.3d 1159 (Second Circuit, 1995)