Vignola v. Hammond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vignola v. Hammond

246 A.D. 637

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Order denying the application of the petitioner for a peremptory or an alternative order of mandamus requiring his reinstatement to the position of regular sweeper in the department of sanitation of the city of New York from which he had been discharged after a hearing on charges of accepting money and gratuities in violation of departmental rules unanimously affirmed, without costs, both on the ground of laches in applying for the remedy and on the merits. Present—Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying the application of the petitioner for a peremptory or an alternative order of mandamus requiring his reinstatement to the position of regular sweeper in the department of sanitation of the city of New York from which he had been discharged after a hearing on charges of accepting money and gratuities in violation of departmental rules unanimously affirmed, without costs, both on the ground of laches in applying for the remedy and on the merits. Present—Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Vignola v. Hammond, 246 A.D. 637 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 637 (Vignola v. Hammond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.