Vignola v. Hammond
This text of 246 A.D. 637 (Vignola v. Hammond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying the application of the petitioner for a peremptory or an alternative order of mandamus requiring his reinstatement to the position of regular sweeper in the department of sanitation of the city of New York from which he had been discharged after a hearing on charges of accepting money and gratuities in violation of departmental rules unanimously affirmed, without costs, both on the ground of laches in applying for the remedy and on the merits. Present—Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vignola-v-hammond-nyappdiv-1935.