Vigno v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.
249 A.D. 784, 292 N.Y.S. 1004, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 28, 1936·Published
Opinion
Order on reargument dismissing the complaint under rule 107, subdivision 6, of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that the alleged action was barred by the Statute of Limitations, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Adel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Vigno v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co., 249 A.D. 784, 292 N.Y.S. 1004, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5996 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
249 A.D. 784 (Vigno v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.