Vigneri v. Vigneri, No. Fa95 032 33 59 S (Jun. 8, 1999)

Connecticut Superior Court

Vigneri v. Vigneri, No. Fa95 032 33 59 S (Jun. 8, 1999)

1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 6784, 25 Conn. L. Rptr. 17

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedJune 8, 1999

DocketNo. FA95 032 33 59 S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 6784 (Vigneri v. Vigneri, No. Fa95 032 33 59 S (Jun. 8, 1999)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vigneri v. Vigneri, No. Fa95 032 33 59 S (Jun. 8, 1999), 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 6784, 25 Conn. L. Rptr. 17 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: CT Page 6785 MOTION FOR TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS The defendant filed a motion for visitation rights with his minor child. On the day of the hearing, the parties presented a written stipulation for approval by the court wherein they agreed that the defendant's parental rights should be terminated. The issue presented is whether the Superior Court has jurisdiction to terminate parental rights in a post-judgment divorce case. It does not and the stipulation is not approved.

"Termination of parental rights means the complete severance by court order of the legal relationship, with all its rights and responsibilities, between the child and his parent or parents so that the child is free for adoption. . . ." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) General Statutes § 17a-93 (e). "The termination of parental rights is governed strictly by statute."In re Bruce R., 234 Conn. 194, 201, 662 A.2d 107 (1995). "[T]he jurisdiction for terminating parental rights lies either in the Probate Court or in the Superior Court pursuant to General Statutes §§ 17a-112¹ and 45a-715 (a)² and (g)."³ (Footnotes added.) Kevin S. v. Dent. of Children and Families,49 Conn. App. 706, 708, 714 A.2d 1289 (1998).⁴

Based on the foregoing, the Superior Court only has jurisdiction to terminate parental rights pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-112 "[i]n respect to any child in the custody of the Commissioner of Children and Families" or if the Probate Court pursuant to General Statutes § 45a-715 (g) transfers a petition for termination of parental rights contested in a court of probate to the Superior Court.

Here, the child is not "in the custody of the Commissioner of Children and Families." Furthermore, no one has petitioned the Probate Court for a termination of parental rights such that a transfer to the Superior Court under General Statutes §45a-715 (g) can be considered. Therefore the Superior Court lacks jurisdiction to terminate the father's parental rights.

CUTSUMPAS, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: CT Page 6785 MOTION FOR TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS The defendant filed a motion for visitation rights with his minor child. On the day of the hearing, the parties presented a written stipulation for approval by the court wherein they agreed that the defendant's parental rights should be terminated. The issue presented is whether the Superior Court has jurisdiction to terminate parental rights in a post-judgment divorce case. It does not and the stipulation is not approved.

"Termination of parental rights means the complete severance by court order of the legal relationship, with all its rights and responsibilities, between the child and his parent or parents so that the child is free for adoption. . . ." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) General Statutes § 17a-93 (e). "The termination of parental rights is governed strictly by statute."In re Bruce R., 234 Conn. 194, 201, 662 A.2d 107 (1995). "[T]he jurisdiction for terminating parental rights lies either in the Probate Court or in the Superior Court pursuant to General Statutes §§ 17a-112¹ and 45a-715 (a)² and (g)."³ (Footnotes added.) Kevin S. v. Dent. of Children and Families,49 Conn. App. 706, 708, 714 A.2d 1289 (1998).⁴

Based on the foregoing, the Superior Court only has jurisdiction to terminate parental rights pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-112 "[i]n respect to any child in the custody of the Commissioner of Children and Families" or if the Probate Court pursuant to General Statutes § 45a-715 (g) transfers a petition for termination of parental rights contested in a court of probate to the Superior Court.

Here, the child is not "in the custody of the Commissioner of Children and Families." Furthermore, no one has petitioned the Probate Court for a termination of parental rights such that a transfer to the Superior Court under General Statutes §45a-715 (g) can be considered. Therefore the Superior Court lacks jurisdiction to terminate the father's parental rights.

CUTSUMPAS, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 6784, 25 Conn. L. Rptr. 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vigneri-v-vigneri-no-fa95-032-33-59-s-jun-8-1999-connsuperct-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack