Vigneaux v. Vigneaux

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vigneaux v. Vigneaux

95 A.D.2d 852, 464 N.Y.S.2d 381, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18800

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 95 A.D.2d 852 (Vigneaux v. Vigneaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vigneaux v. Vigneaux, 95 A.D.2d 852, 464 N.Y.S.2d 381, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a matrimonial action in which plaintiff wife moved for a money judgment for arrears in support, a wage deduction order and counsel fees, and defendant husband cross-moved for an order vacating and/or modifying the support order of September 28, 1982, plaintiff wife appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated December 26, 1982, as denied her motion and which granted defendant’s cross motion to the extent of suspending all payments due under the support order of September 28, 1982, as of December 15,1982. Order modified by adding thereto after the words “as of December 15, 1982”, the words “except for a payment of $55 per week child support”. As so modified, order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. In our opinion, Special Term erred in deleting the child support award. With regard to plaintiff wife’s other contentions, we note that a speedy trial is the best remedy for any seeming inequity in temporary awards (Weisman v Weisman, 39 AD2d 897; Lerner v Lerner, 22 AD2d 771). Damiani, J. P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a matrimonial action in which plaintiff wife moved for a money judgment for arrears in support, a wage deduction order and counsel fees, and defendant husband cross-moved for an order vacating and/or modifying the support order of September 28, 1982, plaintiff wife appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gowan, J.), dated December 26, 1982, as denied her motion and which granted defendant’s cross motion to the extent of suspending all payments due under the support order of September 28, 1982, as of December 15,1982. Order modified by adding thereto after the words “as of December 15, 1982”, the words “except for a payment of $55 per week child support”. As so modified, order affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. In our opinion, Special Term erred in deleting the child support award. With regard to plaintiff wife’s other contentions, we note that a speedy trial is the best remedy for any seeming inequity in temporary awards (Weisman v Weisman, 39 AD2d 897; Lerner v Lerner, 22 AD2d 771). Damiani, J. P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A.D.2d 852, 464 N.Y.S.2d 381, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vigneaux-v-vigneaux-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack