Vignaut v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Vignaut v. Superior Court

291 P. 1112, 48 Cal. App. 354, 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 337

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 29, 1920

DocketCiv. No. 2204.

StatusPublished

This text of 291 P. 1112 (Vignaut v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vignaut v. Superior Court, 291 P. 1112, 48 Cal. App. 354, 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 337 (Cal. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

[1] The petitioner applies for a writ of review to review the action of above-named respondents in making certain orders in the civil action in said superior court pending wherein one Mary W. Vignaut is plaintiff and the petitioner herein is defendant.

It appears from the certificate of the clerk of said superior court on file herein that the orders complained of have been vacated and, in consequence, the petitioner consents that this proceeding be dismissed.

The proceeding is accordingly dismissed.

Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1] The petitioner applies for a writ of review to review the action of above-named respondents in making certain orders in the civil action in said superior court pending wherein one Mary W. Vignaut is plaintiff and the petitioner herein is defendant.

It appears from the certificate of the clerk of said superior court on file herein that the orders complained of have been vacated and, in consequence, the petitioner consents that this proceeding be dismissed.

The proceeding is accordingly dismissed.

Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 P. 1112, 48 Cal. App. 354, 1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vignaut-v-superior-court-calctapp-1920.