Viglione v. State

248 So. 2d 510, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6532
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 26, 1971·No. No. 69-827·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of our review of the briefs, the record on appeal and the oral argument, we are of the opinion that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. The final judgment from which this appeal is taken is, therefore, affirmed. See Robinson v. State, Fla.App.1970, 237 So.2d 268; Watson v. State, Fla.1966, 190 So.2d 161, and Baisden v. State, Fla.App.1967, 203 So. 2d 194.

CROSS, C. J., MAGER, J., and Mc-LANE, RALPH M., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Viglione v. State, 248 So. 2d 510, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6532 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

248 So. 2d 510 (Viglione v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Watson v. State
190 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)
Baisden v. State
203 So. 2d 194 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Robinson v. State
237 So. 2d 268 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)