Vigil v. Walrach

669 F. App'x 106
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 29, 2016·No. No. 16-6050·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frank Vigil, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Vigil v. Walrach, No. 7:15-cv-00063-MFU-RSB, 2015 WL 8584741 (W.D. Va. Dec. 10, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vigil v. Walrach, 669 F. App'x 106 (4th Cir. 2016).

669 F. App'x 106 (Vigil v. Walrach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Corbett v. United States
W.D. North Carolina, 2020