Vigil v. Arguello

New Mexico Supreme Court

Vigil v. Arguello

695 P.2d 477, 102 N.M. 327, 1985 N.M. LEXIS 2132

CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 1, 1985

DocketNo. 15464

StatusPublished

This text of 695 P.2d 477 (Vigil v. Arguello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vigil v. Arguello, 695 P.2d 477, 102 N.M. 327, 1985 N.M. LEXIS 2132 (N.M. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

WALTERS, Justice.

We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals which reversed the trial court’s judgment quieting title to the disputed boundary line area in plaintiffs and enjoining defendant from maintaining the fence on the subject land. Since neither party proved the strength of their respective claims to the disputed land, we granted certiorari merely to clarify the Court of Appeals’ decision, to direct that the judgment to be entered by the district court be a judgment quieting title in plaintiff to all lands other than the disputed boundary area and dismissing that portion of plaintiffs’ claim.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SOSA, S.J., and RIORDAN and STOWERS, JJ., concur. FEDERICI, C.J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

WALTERS, Justice.

We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals which reversed the trial court’s judgment quieting title to the disputed boundary line area in plaintiffs and enjoining defendant from maintaining the fence on the subject land. Since neither party proved the strength of their respective claims to the disputed land, we granted certiorari merely to clarify the Court of Appeals’ decision, to direct that the judgment to be entered by the district court be a judgment quieting title in plaintiff to all lands other than the disputed boundary area and dismissing that portion of plaintiffs’ claim.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SOSA, S.J., and RIORDAN and STOWERS, JJ., concur. FEDERICI, C.J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

695 P.2d 477, 102 N.M. 327, 1985 N.M. LEXIS 2132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vigil-v-arguello-nm-1985.