Viggiani v. Grodotzke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Viggiani v. Grodotzke

306 A.D.2d 273, 760 N.Y.S.2d 337

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 2, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 306 A.D.2d 273 (Viggiani v. Grodotzke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Viggiani v. Grodotzke, 306 A.D.2d 273, 760 N.Y.S.2d 337 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated March 22, 2002, which granted the defendant’s unopposed motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Ralph Viggiani, Jr., did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law 5102 (d).

[274]*274Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs to the respondent.

The plaintiffs did not submit any papers in opposition to the defendant’s motion. No appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing parties (see CPLR 5511; Matter of Abraham S., 291 AD2d 452 [2002]; Ademo v Hotsy Corp., 289 AD2d 271 [2001]). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Friedmann, Adams and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated March 22, 2002, which granted the defendant’s unopposed motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff Ralph Viggiani, Jr., did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law 5102 (d).

[274]*274Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs to the respondent.

The plaintiffs did not submit any papers in opposition to the defendant’s motion. No appeal lies from an order entered upon the default of the appealing parties (see CPLR 5511; Matter of Abraham S., 291 AD2d 452 [2002]; Ademo v Hotsy Corp., 289 AD2d 271 [2001]). Florio, J.P., S. Miller, Friedmann, Adams and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 A.D.2d 273, 760 N.Y.S.2d 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viggiani-v-grodotzke-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack