Vigers v. Mooney

3 N.J.L. 909
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 15, 1811
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 N.J.L. 909 (Vigers v. Mooney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vigers v. Mooney, 3 N.J.L. 909 (N.J. 1811).

Opinion

By the Court:

— Let the affidavits be read; they are not read to contradict the record. The serviceof a summons by leaving a copy with the defendant’s wife is not a good service, unless the wife is at the [*] time of the service, at the residence of the defendant. It is to repel an inference which may possibly be drawn from the return, that as the summons was served on the wife of the defendant, it may be presumed that it was at his place of residence; to take away this presumption, it is proper to read the affidavits.

The affidavits being read, fully proved the facts as stated by Mr. Yan Arsdale. — On which the Court

Reversed the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Williams
648 A.2d 1148 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.J.L. 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vigers-v-mooney-nj-1811.