Vieron v. Knapp

118 So. 769, 9 La. App. 12, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 536
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 18, 1928
DocketNo. 11,467
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 118 So. 769 (Vieron v. Knapp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vieron v. Knapp, 118 So. 769, 9 La. App. 12, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 536 (La. Ct. App. 1928).

Opinion

JONES, J.

Plaintiff sued for one hundred fifty dollars rent ánd obtained a writ of provisional seizure.

Defendant, who had personally filed a general denial, failed to appear at the trial where ample proof of claim was made.

In this Court he has again failed to appear or file brief and plaintiff is clearly entitled to statutory damages for frivolous appeal.

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that there be judgment in favor of plaintiff, [13]*13Louis Vieron, and against defendant, Dr. J. Rollo Knapp, for one hundred fifty dollars, with legal interest from judicial demand and all costs and with ten per cent additional upon the amount of the judgment and interest as damages for frivolous appeal.

It is further ordered that the writ of provisional seizure issued herein he maintained, with recognition of lessor’s lien on the property provisionally seized and that said property he sold and plaintiff’s claim he paid hy preference over all other persons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Devoe & Raynolds Co. v. Turpin & McCain
133 So. 493 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 So. 769, 9 La. App. 12, 1928 La. App. LEXIS 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vieron-v-knapp-lactapp-1928.