Viera v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Viera v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 5039
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 2017·No. 15-1604·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed May 31, 2017.

________________

No. 3D15-1604 Lower Tribunal No. 13-26651 ________________

Eduardo Viera, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Veronica Diaz, Judge.

Law Offices of Daniel J. Tibbitt, and Daniel Tibbitt, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before ROTHENBERG, EMAS, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING OR FOR WRITTEN OPINION

PER CURIAM. We deny the appellant’s motion for rehearing, but grant his motion for

written opinion, withdraw our per curiam affirmance issued on April 26, 2017, and

substitute the following opinion in its place.

We affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentences for aggravated battery,

see Boyd v. State, 910 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 2005), but remand the cause to the trial

court for the sole purpose of entering a written competency order nunc pro tunc.

See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.212(b); Mullens v. State, 197 So. 3d 16 (Fla. 2016);

Dougherty v. State, 149 So. 3d. 672 (Fla. 2014).

Affirmed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Viera v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Viera v. State (Viera v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boyd v. State
910 So. 2d 167 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Khadafy Kareem Mullens v. State of Florida
197 So. 3d 16 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)