Viera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Viera v. State

7 So. 3d 585, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1975, 2009 WL 605344

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 11, 2009

Docket3D07-1617

StatusPublished

This text of 7 So. 3d 585 (Viera v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Viera v. State, 7 So. 3d 585, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1975, 2009 WL 605344 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order revoking Viera’s probation for new law violations, a violation of condition K-4 of his order of probation. On the State’s concession of error, however, we remand so that unproven technical probation violations can be deleted from the written sentence. The oral pronouncement correctly states the trial court’s ruling. The defendant’s presence is not required for this ministerial correction.

Affirmed, but remanded for entry of a corrected revocation order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order revoking Viera’s probation for new law violations, a violation of condition K-4 of his order of probation. On the State’s concession of error, however, we remand so that unproven technical probation violations can be deleted from the written sentence. The oral pronouncement correctly states the trial court’s ruling. The defendant’s presence is not required for this ministerial correction.

Affirmed, but remanded for entry of a corrected revocation order.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 So. 3d 585, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 1975, 2009 WL 605344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viera-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.