Viera v. State

618 So. 2d 372, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5852, 1993 WL 174259
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 25, 1993·No. No. 92-2412·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063 (Fla.1992); Stano v. State, 520 So.2d 278 (Fla.1988); Hitchcock v. State, 432 So.2d 42 (Fla.1983); Judge v. State, 596 So.2d 73 (Fla.2d DCA 1991), rev. denied, 613 So.2d 5 (Fla.1992); Viera v. State, 532 So.2d 743 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), rev. denied, 542 So.2d 991 (Fla.1988).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Viera v. State, 618 So. 2d 372, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 5852, 1993 WL 174259 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

618 So. 2d 372 (Viera v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Viera v. State
532 So. 2d 743 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Hitchcock v. State
432 So. 2d 42 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Judge v. State
596 So. 2d 73 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Stano v. State
520 So. 2d 278 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Smith v. State
598 So. 2d 1063 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)