Viehland v. Moehlmann

Missouri Court of Appeals

Viehland v. Moehlmann

275 S.W.3d 291, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1357, 2008 WL 4472926

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 7, 2008

DocketED 90199

StatusPublished

This text of 275 S.W.3d 291 (Viehland v. Moehlmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Viehland v. Moehlmann, 275 S.W.3d 291, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1357, 2008 WL 4472926 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earlene Viehland (Plaintiff) sued Joshua Moehlmann (Defendant) to collect damages as a result of injuries she suffered and medical expenses she incurred when Defendant rear-ended Plaintiff in a motor vehicle collision on April 16, 2003. The Circuit Court, Franklin County, Cynthia M. Eckelkamp, J., entered judgment on the jury’s verdict in favor of Plaintiff and awarded damages in the amount of $32,000. Plaintiff appealed. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earlene Viehland (Plaintiff) sued Joshua Moehlmann (Defendant) to collect damages as a result of injuries she suffered and medical expenses she incurred when Defendant rear-ended Plaintiff in a motor vehicle collision on April 16, 2003. The Circuit Court, Franklin County, Cynthia M. Eckelkamp, J., entered judgment on the jury’s verdict in favor of Plaintiff and awarded damages in the amount of $32,000. Plaintiff appealed. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 S.W.3d 291, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1357, 2008 WL 4472926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viehland-v-moehlmann-moctapp-2008.