Vidor v. Serlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Vidor v. Serlin

1 A.D.2d 666, 146 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3798

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 666 (Vidor v. Serlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Vidor v. Serlin, 1 A.D.2d 666, 146 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant and the motion, insofar as it sought a direction to make the complaint more definite and certain, granted. In order to enable appellant to answer intelligently, it is necessary that respondent allege the ultimate facts (which in the context of this ease may refer to the specific matters of law that in fact are in dispute) to support the claimed invalidity and unenforcibility of the instruments purporting to assign the property rights in dispute. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peek, P. J., Breitel, Bastow and Cox, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant and the motion, insofar as it sought a direction to make the complaint more definite and certain, granted. In order to enable appellant to answer intelligently, it is necessary that respondent allege the ultimate facts (which in the context of this ease may refer to the specific matters of law that in fact are in dispute) to support the claimed invalidity and unenforcibility of the instruments purporting to assign the property rights in dispute. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peek, P. J., Breitel, Bastow and Cox, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 666, 146 N.Y.S.2d 542, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vidor-v-serlin-nyappdiv-1955.