Videto v. Board of Supervisors

Michigan Supreme Court

Videto v. Board of Supervisors

1 McGrath 1514, 31 McGrath 115

DecidedJanuary 12, 1875

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 1514 (Videto v. Board of Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Videto v. Board of Supervisors, 1 McGrath 1514, 31 McGrath 115 (Mich. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

To compel an allowance of an attorney fee of ten dollars for attending a prosecution before a justice of the peace, under the prohibitory liquor law, in a case where the prosecution was instituted by a private citizen; the attorney was not the prosecuting attorney and the supervisors had prescribed no rule in advance, but had after the service had been rendered allowed relator two dollars and refused to allow any more.

Denied January 12, 1875.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To compel an allowance of an attorney fee of ten dollars for attending a prosecution before a justice of the peace, under the prohibitory liquor law, in a case where the prosecution was instituted by a private citizen; the attorney was not the prosecuting attorney and the supervisors had prescribed no rule in advance, but had after the service had been rendered allowed relator two dollars and refused to allow any more.

Denied January 12, 1875.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 1514, 31 McGrath 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/videto-v-board-of-supervisors-mich-1875.