VideoShare, LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

• Court: District Court, W.D. Texas
• Decided: January 7, 2022
• Docket: 6:21-cv-00254
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WACO DIVISION

VIDEOSHARE, LLC, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL NO. 6:21-CV-00254-ADA § META PLATFORMS, INC., § § Defendant. § §

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER The Court provided preliminary claim constructions on January 6, 2022 for U.S. Patent No. 10,362,341. The Court held a claim construction hearing on January 7, 2022, during which the parties argued the construction of “depending on a compatibility of the second server system or a compatibility of the second client with the first format or the second format.” Dkt. No. 38. The parties also briefed whether “server system” is indefinite. Dkt. Nos. 29, 31, 33, 35. In another case involving the same patent, the Court construed “depending on a compati- bility of the second server system or a compatibility of the second client with the first format or the second format” to mean “after determining which of the first format or second format is most compatible with the second server system or the second client.” VideoShare, LLC v. Google LLC, No. 6:19-cv-00663-ADA, Dkt. No. 69 (W.D. Tex. Nov. 13, 2020). Defendant argues for revising this construction to read “after determining which of the first format and second format is most compatible with the second server system or the second client.” Dkt. 29 at 2 (emphasis added). Plaintiff argues for affirming the previous construction without the change, noting that “or” and “and” are not synonyms. Dkt. 31 at 3. Defendant contends the revision to “and” provides clarity. Dkt. No. 29 at 2-3. Thus, the dispute centers solely on whether to revise the first “or” to “and.” The Court determined whether the Plaintiff or Defendant made arguments most compatible with the law. To do so, the Court analyzed the briefing of both parties. In the same way, the

meaning of “after determining which of the first format or second format is most compatible with the second server system or the second client” is clear and requires no further revision. The Court construes “server system” to have its plain and ordinary meaning and finds “server system” is not indefinite. A clam is indefinite only if it fails to inform those skilled in the art about the scope of invention with reasonable certainty. Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, 572 U.S. 898, 910 (2014). A skilled artisan must know not only what falls inside the scope of the claim term, but also what falls outside of it. Versata Software, Inc. v. Zoho Corp., 213 F. Supp. 3d 829, 836 (W.D. Tex. 2016). Defendant argues that a person of ordinary skill in the art could not discern the outer bound- aries of the “server system” because it “includes no restriction on scale or the number of computers

and programs which may constitute a server system.” Dkt. No. 29 at 6-7. The Court finds that “server system” informs, with reasonable certainty, a person of ordi- nary skill in the art what the scope of invention is: the system includes at least a server. Defendant cites no law requiring claims to define a maximum outer boundary on the number of computers or programs in such a server system. Defendant’s argument that the claim has “no restriction” on the maximum boundary means the maximum boundary is clearly understood, not indefinitely claimed. Further, the parties have reached agreement on the construction of certain claim terms listed in their Joint Claim Construction Statement. Dkt. No. 37. The Court holds the parties to their agreement. CONCLUSION

Construction Construction Construction “depending ona “after determining “after determining “after determining which compatibility of the | which of the first for- | which of the first for- | of the first format or sec- second server system] mat or second format is} mat and second for- | ond format is most com- or a compatibility of | most compatible with | mat is most compati- | patible with the second the second client the second server sys- | ble with the second server system or the sec- with the first format | tem or the second cli- | server system or the | ond client” or the second for- ent” second client” mat” meaning ordinary meaning

SIGNED on this 7th day of January 2022.

Cn O\\oe ALAN D ALBRIGHT UNITED STATES DISTRIC JDGE