Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Vidals v. Reyes

Vidals v. Reyes

300 A.D.2d 300, 750 N.Y.S.2d 769
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 2, 2002
StatusPublished

This text of 300 A.D.2d 300 (Vidals v. Reyes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Vidals v. Reyes, 300 A.D.2d 300, 750 N.Y.S.2d 769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff Cristobal Vidals appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated September 5, 2001, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the defendant’s counterclaim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant failed to sustain his burden of establishing entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). Therefore, his motion for summary judgment was properly denied, regardless of the sufficiency of the defendant’s opposing papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851). Feuerstein, J.P., Smith, O’Brien and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zuckerman v. City of New York
404 N.E.2d 718 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Winegrad v. New York University Medical Center
476 N.E.2d 642 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
300 A.D.2d 300, 750 N.Y.S.2d 769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vidals-v-reyes-nyappdiv-2002.