Vidal v. State

890 So. 2d 1162, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19643, 2004 WL 2952775
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Vidal v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 820 So. 2d 408
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 22, 2004·No. No. 4D04-2415·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eddie Vidal appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief, raising seven grounds for relief, all claims of ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. We find that the first three claims-failing to move to strike an openly biased juror, affirmatively misadvising him concerning the implications of testifying in his own behalf, and failing to call three prospective witnesses (whom Vidal named, alleged were available, and explained how the substance of their proposed testimony would assist his case) — are legally sufficient grounds that were not refuted by the record. We remand for either the attachment of additional portions of the record or an evidentiary hearing.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

STONE, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Vidal v. State, 890 So. 2d 1162, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19643, 2004 WL 2952775 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

890 So. 2d 1162 (Vidal v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.