Vidal (Francisco) Vs. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

FRANCISCO ENRIQUE VIDAL, No. 80941 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent.

APR Ei 2020 0_17.1 SROVOZ CLERKQf sUFE

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for reconsideration. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for reconsideration. in a criminal matter, we lack jurisdiction. Phelps v. State, 111 Nev. 1021, 1022-23, 900 P.2d 344, 344-45 (1995); Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

LL:144i/D , J.

Stiglich. Silver

SUPPE/4E COURT OF

To- p4ro

NEVADA

(0) 1947A vialo

•.tS 4

,J,e•

•

- A

cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Francisco Enrique Vidal Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A

2

4111114.-12 ;A ii