Vidal (Francisco) Vs. State
This text of Vidal (Francisco) Vs. State (Vidal (Francisco) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
FRANCISCO ENRIQUE VIDAL, No. 80941 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. APR Ei 2020 0_17.1 SROVOZ CLERKQf sUFE
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for reconsideration. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas W. Herndon, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for reconsideration. in a criminal matter, we lack jurisdiction. Phelps v. State, 111 Nev. 1021, 1022-23, 900 P.2d 344, 344-45 (1995); Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
LL:144i/D , J. Stiglich. Silver
SUPPE/4E COURT OF
To- p4ro NEVADA
(0) 1947A vialo
•.tS 4 ,J,e• • - A cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Francisco Enrique Vidal Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2 4111114.-12 ;A ii
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Vidal (Francisco) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/vidal-francisco-vs-state-nev-2020.