Viczian v. Viczian

64 A.D.2d 593, 407 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12348
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 20, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 64 A.D.2d 593 (Viczian v. Viczian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Viczian v. Viczian, 64 A.D.2d 593, 407 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12348 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 3, 1976, dismissing plaintiff’s .complaint and granting defendant a judgment of divorce on his counterclaim, unanimously modified, on the law, and the facts, without costs or disbursements, to the extent of vacating the judgment of divorce, dismissing the counterclaim for divorce, dismissing the complaint, and deleting the provision barring plaintiff’s use of the surname "Viczian”, and, except, as thus modified, affirmed. The actions of neither party constitute sufficient grounds to grant either the divorce sought by the husband for cruel and inhuman treatment or the separation sought by the wife for abandonment. Trial Term properly dismissed the wife’s separation action. Although the parties are clearly and irrevocably incompatible "the application of the cruel and inhuman treatment ground to every 'dead marriage’ would * * * seem unwarranted” (Hessen v Hessen, 33 NY2d 406, 411). The State Legislature has limited the grounds for divorce. The courts should not be used to circumvent the Legislature’s will by creating addi[594]*594tional grounds. The counterclaim should have been dismissed along with the complaint. The judgment imperfectly effectuated the court’s finding and decision dismissing the complaint (a resolution with which we agree). Consequently, we have repaired the judgment in the respect. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Silverman, Fein, Lane and Sullivan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. Davis
71 A.D.3d 13 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Brady v. Brady
476 N.E.2d 290 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
Phillips v. Phillips
70 A.D.2d 30 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 A.D.2d 593, 407 N.Y.S.2d 171, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/viczian-v-viczian-nyappdiv-1978.