Victory v. State

422 So. 2d 67
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 17, 1982
Docket81-1608
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 422 So. 2d 67 (Victory v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Victory v. State, 422 So. 2d 67 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

422 So.2d 67 (1982)

Roger VICTORY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 81-1608.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 17, 1982.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and Paul C. Helm, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael A. Palecki, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

DANAHY, Judge.

The defendant stole some tractor-trailers in Pasco County. On the same date, he took the trailers to Manatee County and sold them to Ramon Garcia for $4,500 in cash and a $3,000 note. The defendant was convicted of grand theft in Pasco County.

*68 This appeal arises from Manatee County, where the defendant was charged with dealing in stolen property and grand theft. The grand theft charge was based on the defendant's obtaining money and a note from Garcia by falsely representing that he had clear title to the trailers. The defendant's motion to dismiss the charges in Manatee County was denied. The defendant then pled nolo contendere reserving his right to appeal the denial of the motion to dismiss. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Section 812.025, Florida Statutes (1981), forbids convictions for both theft and dealing in stolen property in connection with one scheme or course of conduct. The defendant having been convicted of grand theft in Pasco County, he may not also be convicted in Manatee County for the offense of dealing in the property stolen. Kelly v. State, 397 So.2d 709 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). We reverse as to that conviction.

However, we see no impediment to the conviction in Manatee County for grand theft based upon the fact that the defendant obtained Garcia's money and note by falsely representing that he had clear title to the trailers. Section 775.021(4), Fla. Stat. (1981); Borges v. State, 415 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 1982). Therefore, we affirm the grand theft conviction.

REVERSED in part and AFFIRMED in part.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and GRIMES, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blackmon v. State
121 So. 3d 535 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2013)
Anucinski v. State
90 So. 3d 879 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Williams v. State
66 So. 3d 360 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Hall v. State
826 So. 2d 268 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Hall v. State
767 So. 2d 560 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
T.S.R. v. State
596 So. 2d 766 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Stallworth v. State
538 So. 2d 1296 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Duncan v. State
503 So. 2d 443 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Rife v. State
446 So. 2d 1157 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Cleaves v. State
450 So. 2d 511 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
422 So. 2d 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victory-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.