Victoria VanBuren v. Daniel Urban

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 21, 2025
Docket03-24-00539-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Victoria VanBuren v. Daniel Urban (Victoria VanBuren v. Daniel Urban) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Victoria VanBuren v. Daniel Urban, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00539-CV

Victoria VanBuren, Appellant

v.

Daniel Urban, Appellee

FROM THE 455TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. D-1-FM-23-001227, THE HONORABLE AMY CLARK MEACHUM, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant Victoria VanBuren appeals from the trial court’s July 26, 2024 order

rendering judgment on a jury verdict finding grounds for an annulment. After appellee Daniel

Urban filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, asserting that the annulment

order is not a final and appealable order, this Court abated the case for entry of a final and

appealable order or judgment.

In the underlying case, the issues were bifurcated into two trials. After the trial court

signed the July 26, 2024 order rendering judgment on the annulment, the parties tried the remaining

issues, including property distribution, in a second, final bench trial on August 27, 28, and 30, 2024.

A letter ruling on those issues was anticipated to be provided to the parties by September 30, 2024.

Accordingly, we abated the appeal and remanded the case to the trial court to allow VanBuren to

obtain a signed final and appealable order or judgment. See, e.g., Davidson v. Davidson, No. 03-19-00542-CV, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Dec. 20, 2019, order) (per curiam); O’Kroley

v. Sherwin-Williams Co., No. 11-17-00339-CV, 2018 WL 2212950, at *1 (Tex. App.—Eastland

May 10, 2018, order) (per curiam).

As instructed, VanBuren has filed a motion to extend the abatement accompanied by

a status report, informing the Court that a final and appealable judgment has not yet been signed.

We grant VanBuren’s motion, extend our abatement of this appeal, and remand this case to the trial

court to provide VanBuren additional time to obtain a final and appealable judgment. We instruct

the trial-court clerk to prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s final and

appealable judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(1). We further instruct VanBuren to file a motion

to reinstate the appeal or a motion to extend the abatement accompanied by a report advising us of

the status of the case no later than February 20, 2025. If either a supplemental clerk’s record

containing a final and appealable judgment or an appropriate motion is not filed in this Court by

February 20, 2025, we may dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

It is ordered on January 21, 2025.

Before Justices Triana, Theofanis, and Crump

Abated and Remanded

Filed: January 21, 2025

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Victoria VanBuren v. Daniel Urban, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victoria-vanburen-v-daniel-urban-texapp-2025.