Victoria VanBuren v. Daniel Urban
This text of Victoria VanBuren v. Daniel Urban (Victoria VanBuren v. Daniel Urban) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-24-00539-CV
Victoria VanBuren, Appellant
v.
Daniel Urban, Appellee
FROM THE 455TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. D-1-FM-23-001227, THE HONORABLE AMY CLARK MEACHUM, JUDGE PRESIDING
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Victoria VanBuren appeals from the trial court’s July 26, 2024 order
rendering judgment on a jury verdict finding grounds for an annulment. After appellee Daniel
Urban filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, asserting that the annulment
order is not a final and appealable order, this Court abated the case for entry of a final and
appealable order or judgment.
In the underlying case, the issues were bifurcated into two trials. After the trial court
signed the July 26, 2024 order rendering judgment on the annulment, the parties tried the remaining
issues, including property distribution, in a second, final bench trial on August 27, 28, and 30, 2024.
A letter ruling on those issues was anticipated to be provided to the parties by September 30, 2024.
Accordingly, we abated the appeal and remanded the case to the trial court to allow VanBuren to
obtain a signed final and appealable order or judgment. See, e.g., Davidson v. Davidson, No. 03-19-00542-CV, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Dec. 20, 2019, order) (per curiam); O’Kroley
v. Sherwin-Williams Co., No. 11-17-00339-CV, 2018 WL 2212950, at *1 (Tex. App.—Eastland
May 10, 2018, order) (per curiam).
As instructed, VanBuren has filed a motion to extend the abatement accompanied by
a status report, informing the Court that a final and appealable judgment has not yet been signed.
We grant VanBuren’s motion, extend our abatement of this appeal, and remand this case to the trial
court to provide VanBuren additional time to obtain a final and appealable judgment. We instruct
the trial-court clerk to prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s final and
appealable judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)(1). We further instruct VanBuren to file a motion
to reinstate the appeal or a motion to extend the abatement accompanied by a report advising us of
the status of the case no later than February 20, 2025. If either a supplemental clerk’s record
containing a final and appealable judgment or an appropriate motion is not filed in this Court by
February 20, 2025, we may dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).
It is ordered on January 21, 2025.
Before Justices Triana, Theofanis, and Crump
Abated and Remanded
Filed: January 21, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Victoria VanBuren v. Daniel Urban, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victoria-vanburen-v-daniel-urban-texapp-2025.