Victoria Rodriguez v. Angel Rodriguez, Jr.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 21, 2024
Docket2023-1817
StatusPublished

This text of Victoria Rodriguez v. Angel Rodriguez, Jr. (Victoria Rodriguez v. Angel Rodriguez, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Victoria Rodriguez v. Angel Rodriguez, Jr., (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed August 21, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-1817 Lower Tribunal No. 19-1033-K ________________

Victoria Rodriguez, Appellant,

vs.

Angel Rodriguez, Jr., Appellee.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Bonnie J. Helms, Judge.

Victoria Rodriguez, in proper person.

Andrew M. Kassier, P.A., and Andrew M. Kassier, for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ.

MILLER, J. Appellant, the mother, challenges a default final judgment of

dissolution of marriage awarding appellee, the father, sole parental

responsibility for their fourteen-year-old daughter and ordering the payment

of child support. Contrary to the father’s contention, the denial of due

process constitutes fundamental error, which can be raised for the first time

on appeal. See Weiser v. Weiser, 132 So. 3d 309, 311 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

Nonetheless, in this case, the undeveloped record compels affirmance. We

do so, however, without prejudice to the mother’s ability to file a timely and

appropriate motion pursuant to Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure

12.540(b) in the lower tribunal seeking to vacate the final order and convene

an evidentiary hearing on her claim that she did not receive notice. See

Vasquez v. Nadra, 337 So. 3d 403, 404 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (affirming denial

of 1.540(b) motion without prejudice to timely filing of “an appropriate rule

1.540(b)(4) motion to allow the trial court, in the first instance, to address her

voidness claim”); see also Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.440(c) (“[T]he court . . . shall

enter an order setting the action for trial, fixing a date for trial, and setting a

pretrial conference, if necessary. In the event a default has been entered,

reasonable notice of not less than 10 days shall be given unless otherwise

required by law.”).

Affirmed, without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weiser v. Weiser
132 So. 3d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Victoria Rodriguez v. Angel Rodriguez, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victoria-rodriguez-v-angel-rodriguez-jr-fladistctapp-2024.