Victoria Nicholson v. U. S. Dept. of Agriculture
This text of 275 F. App'x 878 (Victoria Nicholson v. U. S. Dept. of Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint in this case alleges that the Department of Agriculture erroneously, arbitrarily and with intent to discriminate against Victoria Nicholson and her husband placed Victoria Nicholson’s loan in foreclosure in violation of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1691 et seq. The Secretary moved the district court for summary judgment, and the court granted his motion on two alternative grounds: the claim was time-barred, and the Nicholsons failed to make out a prima facie case of discrimination.
The Nicholsons now appeal. We agree that the claim is time-barred and that the Nicholsons failed to establish a prima fa-cie case. The district court’s judgment is, accordingly,
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
275 F. App'x 878, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victoria-nicholson-v-u-s-dept-of-agriculture-ca11-2008.