Victoria Haynes v. Jack Wagoner, III

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-2320

___________________________

Victoria L. Haynes

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Jack Wagoner, III; Wagoner Law Firm, P.A.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro

____________

Submitted: May 30, 2018 Filed: June 4, 2018 [Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Victoria L. Haynes appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her diversity legal malpractice action as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Upon de novo

1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

review, see Dittmer Properties, L.P. v. FDIC, 708 F.3d 1011, 1016 (8th Cir. 2013) standard of review for dismissal based on failure to state claim); Sloan v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co., 368 F.3d 853, 854 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review for district court’s application of state law in diversity case), we agree that the action is timebarred . The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________