Victoria Haynes v. Jack Wagoner, III
This text of Victoria Haynes v. Jack Wagoner, III (Victoria Haynes v. Jack Wagoner, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 17-2320 ___________________________
Victoria L. Haynes
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Jack Wagoner, III; Wagoner Law Firm, P.A.
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Jonesboro ____________
Submitted: May 30, 2018 Filed: June 4, 2018 [Unpublished] ____________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Victoria L. Haynes appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her diversity legal malpractice action as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Upon de novo
1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. review, see Dittmer Properties, L.P. v. FDIC, 708 F.3d 1011, 1016 (8th Cir. 2013) standard of review for dismissal based on failure to state claim); Sloan v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co., 368 F.3d 853, 854 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review for district court’s application of state law in diversity case), we agree that the action is time- barred. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Victoria Haynes v. Jack Wagoner, III, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victoria-haynes-v-jack-wagoner-iii-ca8-2018.