Victoria Dutton v. Farmers Group, Inc. - Concurring
This text of Victoria Dutton v. Farmers Group, Inc. - Concurring (Victoria Dutton v. Farmers Group, Inc. - Concurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE November 3, 2009 Session
VICTORIA DUTTON ET AL. v. FARMERS GROUP, INC., ET AL.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Knox County No. 3-278-08 Wheeler A. Rosenbalm, Judge
No. E2009-00746-COA-R3-CV - FILED JUNE 22, 2010
C HARLES D. S USANO, JR., J., concurring.
I agree with the majority that, given the present state of the record in this case, summary judgment is not appropriate. As the record now stands, “[w]hether the plaintiff[s] exercised reasonable care and diligence in discovering the injury or wrong is . . . a fact question for the [trier of fact] to determine.” Wyatt v. A-Best Company, 910 S.W.2d 851, 854 (Tenn. 1995). In other words, there is a genuine issue as to this material fact. At trial, the finder of fact must determine if the plaintiffs filed suit within one year of the point in time when they1 first knew, or, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should have known that an actionable injury had occurred. Id. at 856-57.
_______________________________ CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., JUDGE
1 While I have used the plural “they,” it is clear that each claim must be separately evaluated as to this issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Victoria Dutton v. Farmers Group, Inc. - Concurring, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victoria-dutton-v-farmers-group-inc-concurring-tennctapp-2010.