Victoria Dominique Lopez v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 5, 2020
Docket05-20-00465-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Victoria Dominique Lopez v. State (Victoria Dominique Lopez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Victoria Dominique Lopez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 5, 2020

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00465-CR

VICTORIA DOMINIQUE LOPEZ, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F15-52299-S

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Whitehill, Osborne, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Osborne On December 17, 2015, after Victoria Dominique Lopez pleaded nolo

contendere to possession of methamphetamine, the trial court deferred adjudication

of guilt for five years. Thereafter, the State filed a motion to proceed with an

adjudication of guilt, alleging appellant had violated numerous terms and conditions

of her probation. On February 17, 2020, the trial court continued appellant on

probation for two years. Appellant’s notice of appeal, dated March 13, 2020, was

filed in this Court on March 27, 2020. As a general rule, an appellate court may consider appeals by criminal

defendants only after conviction. Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—

Dallas 1998, no pet.). With regard to deferred adjudication, the Legislature has

authorized appeal of only two types of orders: (1) an order granting deferred

adjudication, and (2) an order imposing punishment pursuant to an adjudication of

guilt. Davis v. State, 195 S.W.3d 708, 711 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Orders

modifying the terms or conditions of deferred adjudication are not themselves

appealable. Id.

Here, there is no judgment of conviction. Rather, the trial court continued

appellant on probation. We do not have jurisdiction over an order continuing a

defendant on community supervision. See id.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

/Leslie Osborne/ LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b) 200465F.U05

–2– S Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

VICTORIA DOMINIQUE LOPEZ, On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial Appellant District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F15-52299-S. No. 05-20-00465-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne. Justices Whitehill and THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Carlyle participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS this appeal.

Judgment entered May 5, 2020

–3–

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. State
195 S.W.3d 708 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Wright v. State
969 S.W.2d 588 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Victoria Dominique Lopez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victoria-dominique-lopez-v-state-texapp-2020.