Victoria Christian Russell v. Robert W. Russell

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 10, 2023
DocketA23A1687
StatusPublished

This text of Victoria Christian Russell v. Robert W. Russell (Victoria Christian Russell v. Robert W. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Victoria Christian Russell v. Robert W. Russell, (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ July 10, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A23A1687. VICTORIA CHRISTIAN RUSSELL v. ROBERT W. RUSSELL.

In this civil action arising under the Family Violence Act, OCGA § 19-13-1 et seq., the trial court entered a “Stalking Three Year/Permanent Protective Order” on April 6, 2023. Respondent Victoria Christian Russell then filed a notice of appeal on May 26, 2023, seeking appellate review of the April 6 order.1 We lack jurisdiction for several reasons. First, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or trial court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Redford v. State, 357 Ga. App. 247, 250 (850 SE2d 447) (2020). Victoria Christian Russell’s notice of appeal is untimely, as it was filed 50 days after entry of the order. Moreover, appeals of orders in domestic relations cases – including actions arising under the Family Violence Act – must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2); Schmidt v. Schmidt, 270 Ga. 461, 461-462 (1) (510 SE2d 810) (1999), disapproved on other grounds by Gilliam v. State, 312 Ga. 60, 64 (860 SE2d 543) (2021). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Victoria Christian Russell’s failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction.

1 It appears that Victoria Christian Russell filed a motion to set aside the April 6 order. However, the record does not contain a ruling on that motion. Accordingly, this direct appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 07/10/2023 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schmidt v. Schmidt
510 S.E.2d 810 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)
Smoak v. Department of Human Resources
471 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Gilliam v. State
860 S.E.2d 543 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Victoria Christian Russell v. Robert W. Russell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victoria-christian-russell-v-robert-w-russell-gactapp-2023.