Victor Wriden v. State
This text of Victor Wriden v. State (Victor Wriden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
VICTOR WRIDEN,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D16-4087
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed March 9, 2018
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Alan S. Apte, Judge.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Andrew Mich, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kaylee D Tatman, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm Victor Wriden’s convictions and sentences. However, we remand this
matter to the trial court to enter a written order adjudicating Wriden competent to proceed
nunc pro tunc to August 27, 2015, the date when the trial court orally found on the record
that Wriden was competent. AFFIRMED AND REMANDED FOR ENTRY OF ORDER.
SAWAYA, ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Victor Wriden v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-wriden-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.