Victor v. SMITHWAY MOTOR XPRESS

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Victor v. SMITHWAY MOTOR XPRESS

729 N.W.2d 576, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 172, 2007 WL 1018366

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMarch 28, 2007

DocketA06-2413

StatusPublished

This text of 729 N.W.2d 576 (Victor v. SMITHWAY MOTOR XPRESS) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Victor v. SMITHWAY MOTOR XPRESS, 729 N.W.2d 576, 2007 Minn. LEXIS 172, 2007 WL 1018366 (Mich. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed November 21, 2006, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that “[sjummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI