Home/New York Court of Appeals/Victor v. Lyon Associates, Inc.

Victor v. Lyon Associates, Inc.

234 N.E.2d 459, 21 N.Y.2d 695, 287 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 992
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 29, 1967·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

In Victor v. Lyon Assoc.: Order affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of Chief Judge Fuld in Simpson v. Loehmann (21 N Y 2d 305, decided herewith). Question certified answered in the affirmative. All concur, Judges Keating and Breitel on the grounds stated in their respective concurring opinions in Simpson v. Loehmann, and Judge Bergan on the grounds stated in the concurring opinion by Judge Breitel in Simpson v. Loehmann, except Judges Burke and Scileppi who dissent and vote to reverse on the grounds stated in the dissenting opinion in Simpson v. Loehmann.

In Matter of Victor v. Hanover Ins. Co.: The direct appeal is dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from is not final. No opinion. Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating and Breitel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Victor v. Lyon Associates, Inc., 234 N.E.2d 459, 21 N.Y.2d 695, 287 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 992 (N.Y. 1967).

234 N.E.2d 459 (Victor v. Lyon Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barbara G. Holzsager, of the Estate of Donald M. Holzsager, Deceased, and Barbara G. Holzsager, Individually v. The Valley Hospital
646 F.2d 792 (Second Circuit, 1981)
Holzsager v. Valley Hospital
493 F. Supp. 120 (S.D. New York, 1980)
Savchuk v. Rush
272 N.W.2d 888 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1978)
In re the Estate of Norton
90 Misc. 2d 423 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1977)
Sykes v. Beal
392 F. Supp. 1089 (D. Connecticut, 1975)
Rintala v. Shoemaker
362 F. Supp. 1044 (D. Minnesota, 1973)
Turner v. Evers
31 Cal. App. 3d 11 (California Court of Appeal, 1973)
Turner v. Evers
31 Cal. App. Supp. 3d 11 (Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California, 1973)
Marie Minichiello, as of the Estate of Thomas Minichiello, and Marie Minichiello v. Oliver Rosenberg, Elwin W. Stevens, on Behalf of His Son, Dennis J. Stevens, an Infant Overfourteen Years of Age, and Elwin W. Stevens, Individually v. Stephen H. Tyng, Sr. And Stephen H. Tyng, Jr.
410 F.2d 106 (Second Circuit, 1969)
Varady v. Margolis
303 F. Supp. 23 (S.D. New York, 1968)
Minichiello v. Rosenberg
410 F.2d 106 (Second Circuit, 1968)