Victor v. Broad Street Hotel Co.
91 S.E. 931, 19 Ga. App. 592, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 243
This text of 91 S.E. 931 (Victor v. Broad Street Hotel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Victor v. Broad Street Hotel Co., 91 S.E. 931, 19 Ga. App. 592, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 243 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
Opinion
A judgment on issues of fact, rendered by a judge who by consent tried the case without a jury, will not be set aside by this court when it appears that the evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to support his finding. Small v. Charleston Bagging Mfg. Co., 102 Ga. 585 (27 S. E. 763).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brown v. Rutledge & Summerour
92 S.E. 774 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 931, 19 Ga. App. 592, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-v-broad-street-hotel-co-gactapp-1917.