Victor v. Broad Street Hotel Co.

91 S.E. 931, 19 Ga. App. 592, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 243
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 20, 1917·No. 7833·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

A judgment on issues of fact, rendered by a judge who by consent tried the case without a jury, will not be set aside by this court when it appears that the evidence, though conflicting, was sufficient to support his finding. Small v. Charleston Bagging Mfg. Co., 102 Ga. 585 (27 S. E. 763).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Victor v. Broad Street Hotel Co., 91 S.E. 931, 19 Ga. App. 592, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 243 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

91 S.E. 931 (Victor v. Broad Street Hotel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Rutledge & Summerour
92 S.E. 774 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)