Victor Todd Williams v. State
Opinion
Motion Granted in Part and Order filed March 26, 2015.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-13-00708-CR ____________
VICTOR TODD WILLIAMS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 339th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1386052
ORDER
Appellant has filed a motion to supplement the record. The motion states the appellate record does not contain (1) appellant’s motion for new trial; (2) appellant’s response to trial counsel’s motion to quash; or (3) the hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial. The third supplemental clerk’s record filed January 13, 2015, contains appellant’s motion for new trial. A reporter’s record was filed January 21, 2015, of the hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial. Accordingly, the motion to supplement the record is granted in part.
The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before April 6, 2015, containing appellant’s response to the motion to quash.
If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.
PER CURIAM
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Victor Todd Williams v. State (Victor Todd Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.