Victor Todd Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 26, 2015·No. 14-13-00708-CR·Published

Opinion

Motion Granted in Part and Order filed March 26, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-13-00708-CR ____________

VICTOR TODD WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1386052

ORDER

Appellant has filed a motion to supplement the record. The motion states the appellate record does not contain (1) appellant’s motion for new trial; (2) appellant’s response to trial counsel’s motion to quash; or (3) the hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial. The third supplemental clerk’s record filed January 13, 2015, contains appellant’s motion for new trial. A reporter’s record was filed January 21, 2015, of the hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial. Accordingly, the motion to supplement the record is granted in part.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before April 6, 2015, containing appellant’s response to the motion to quash.

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Victor Todd Williams v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Victor Todd Williams v. State (Victor Todd Williams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.