Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Caubre

174 A. 525, 116 N.J. Eq. 592, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 721
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 27, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 174 A. 525 (Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Caubre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Caubre, 174 A. 525, 116 N.J. Eq. 592, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 721 (N.J. 1934).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Davis in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchakd, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ier, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stambovsky v. Cohen
1 A.2d 456 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 A. 525, 116 N.J. Eq. 592, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-talking-machine-co-v-caubre-nj-1934.