Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Caubre
174 A. 525, 116 N.J. Eq. 592, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 721
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Davis in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchakd, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hei-ier, Perskie, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Caubre, 174 A. 525, 116 N.J. Eq. 592, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 721 (N.J. 1934).
174 A. 525 (Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Caubre) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stambovsky v. Cohen
1 A.2d 456 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1938)