Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Berwald

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Berwald

170 F. 128, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5509

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedApril 22, 1909

StatusPublished

This text of 170 F. 128 (Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Berwald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Berwald, 170 F. 128, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5509 (circtsdny 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

TACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The defendant is found guilty of disobedience of the court’s orders, and is fined $25 for his contempt; the same payable to the United States. This small amount is imposed because he frankly admitted his offense, and upon the understanding that he will not be guilty of any future acts of disobedience. Should he offend again, the consideration which has been shown him upon this motion will be an element to be considered in fixing the amount of his punishment for such new offense.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The defendant is found guilty of disobedience of the court’s orders, and is fined $25 for his contempt; the same payable to the United States. This small amount is imposed because he frankly admitted his offense, and upon the understanding that he will not be guilty of any future acts of disobedience. Should he offend again, the consideration which has been shown him upon this motion will be an element to be considered in fixing the amount of his punishment for such new offense.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

170 F. 128, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-talking-machine-co-v-berwald-circtsdny-1909.