Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Sonora Phonograph Co.

191 F. 988
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Sonora Phonograph Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 188 F. 330
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided November 17, 1911·Published

Opinion

EACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

Upon the argument I formed the impression that in the machine, which defendant conceded that it had sold in substantially the condition in which it now is, the amount of “swing” or .“looseness”-of the arm was such as to bring it fairly within the terms of the injunction. It has not seemed necessary to examine this branch of the case more extensively, nor to determine whether the original impression be or be not correct, because of the absence of any evidence upon which the amount of a remedial fine could be determined. There is nothing to show what pecuniary loss or damage plaintiffs have sustained in consequence of the sale of these two or three machines.

The motion is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Sonora Phonograph Co., 191 F. 988 (circtsdny 1911).

191 F. 988 (Victor Talking Mach. Co. v. Sonora Phonograph Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.