Victor T. Livermon v. David K. Smith, Warden

Fourth Circuit

Victor T. Livermon v. David K. Smith, Warden

37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34867, 1994 WL 577724

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 19, 1994

Docket93-6967

StatusPublished

This text of 37 F.3d 1494 (Victor T. Livermon v. David K. Smith, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Victor T. Livermon v. David K. Smith, Warden, 37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34867, 1994 WL 577724 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

37 F.3d 1494
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Victor T. LIVERMON, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
David K. SMITH, Warden, Respondent Appellee.

No. 93-6967.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 1994.
Decided October 19, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-22-R)

Victor T. Livermon, appellant pro se.

Katherine P. Baldwin, Michael Thomas Judge, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Livermon v. Smith, No. CA-93-22-R (E.D. Va. Aug. 6, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

37 F.3d 1494
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Victor T. LIVERMON, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
David K. SMITH, Warden, Respondent Appellee.

No. 93-6967.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 24, 1994.
Decided October 19, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-22-R)

Victor T. Livermon, appellant pro se.

Katherine P. Baldwin, Michael Thomas Judge, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Livermon v. Smith, No. CA-93-22-R (E.D. Va. Aug. 6, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 F.3d 1494, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34867, 1994 WL 577724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-t-livermon-v-david-k-smith-warden-ca4-1994.