Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedFebruary 20, 2013

Docket12-1638

StatusUnpublished

This text of Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc. (Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

VICTOR STANLEY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CREATIVE PIPE, INC., AND MARK T. PAPPAS, Defendants-Appellants,

AND

STEPHANIE E. PAPPAS, AND JOHN DOE, (also known as Fred Bass) Defendants. ______________________

2012-1638 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in No. 06-CV-2662, Judge Marvin J. Garbis. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

ROBERT B. WOLINSKY, Hogan Lovells US, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. JOSHUA J. KAUFMAN, Venable, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. Of counsel on the brief was JAMES A. ROTHSCHILD, Anderson, Coe & King, LLP, of Baltimore, Maryland. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, * Chief District Judge).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 20, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

* Honorable Leonard Davis, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI