Victor Rajjaunh Harvey v. the State of Texas
This text of Victor Rajjaunh Harvey v. the State of Texas (Victor Rajjaunh Harvey v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-25-00394-CR
VICTOR RAJJAUNH HARVEY, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 154th District Court Lamb County, Texas Trial Court No. DCR-6186-21, Honorable Scott A. Say, Presiding
May 20, 2026 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Victor Rajjaunh Harvey, appeals from the trial court’s judgment revoking
his community supervision for the offense of assault of a family or household member1
and sentencing him to nine years and nine months of confinement. Appellant’s brief was
due April 13, 2026, but was not filed. By letter of April 21, 2026, we admonished
Appellant’s appointed counsel that failure to file a brief by May 1, 2026, would result in
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE § 22.01(b)(2)(A). the appeal being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings
without further notice. To date, Appellant’s counsel has neither filed a brief nor had any
further communication with this Court.
Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3). Upon remand, the trial court shall
determine the following:
1. whether Appellant still desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. whether Appellant is indigent;
3. if Appellant is not indigent, whether Appellant has made the necessary
arrangements for filing a brief;
4. why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of Appellant;
5. whether Appellant’s counsel has abandoned the appeal;
6. whether Appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel;
7. whether new counsel should be appointed; and
8. if Appellant desires to continue the appeal, the date the Court may expect
Appellant’s brief to be filed.
The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a
supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this Court by June 22, 2026.
If it is determined that Appellant desires to proceed with the appeal, is indigent, and has
been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint new counsel;
the name, address, email address, phone number, and state bar number of any newly
appointed counsel shall be included in the aforementioned findings.
2 Should Appellant’s counsel file a brief on or before the date the trial court acts per
our directive, he shall immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon
the trial court shall not be required to take any further action.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Victor Rajjaunh Harvey v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-rajjaunh-harvey-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp7-2026.