Victor R. Ziegler, Sr. v. Sally Jewell
This text of 637 F. App'x 246 (Victor R. Ziegler, Sr. v. Sally Jewell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Victor R. Ziegler, Sr., appeals the district court’s 1 order, following a bench trial, finding that the Department of Interior met its burden of proving that its settlement agreement with Ziegler was obtained in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act (OWBPA). Having reviewed the district court’s legal conclusions de novo, and its factual findings for clear error, see Stonebridge Collection, Inc. v. Carmichael, 791 F.3d 811, 817 (8th Cir.2015), we agree that the evidence showed Ziegler’s waiver of his claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act was knowing and voluntary, and thus valid, as the settlement agreement, at a minimum, met the applicable requirements under 29 U.S.C. § 626(f), see Parsons v. Pioneer Seed Hi-Bred Int’l, Inc., 447 F.3d 1102, 1104 (8th Cir.2006) (discussing protections under OWBPA). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable Lawrence L.. Piersol, United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
637 F. App'x 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-r-ziegler-sr-v-sally-jewell-ca8-2016.