Victor Omeni Igwe AKA Steve Arthur Douglas v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: April 20, 2006
• Docket: 14-05-00933-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 20, 2006

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 20, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-05-00933-CR

VICTOR OMENI IGWE AKA STEVE ARTHUR DOUGLAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 759,423

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Victor Omeni Igwe appeals the trial court=s denial of his motion for post-conviction DNA testing.  See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. arts. 64.01‑.05.  Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed April 20, 2006.

Panel consists of Justices Hudson, Fowler, and Seymore.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).