Victor N. Cervantes v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 16, 2019
Docket04-18-00796-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Victor N. Cervantes v. State (Victor N. Cervantes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Victor N. Cervantes v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-18-00796-CR

Victor N. CERVANTES, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CR11119 Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 16, 2019

DISMISSED

On December 7, 2018, this court issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed

pursuant to Rule 25.2(d) unless an amended trial court certification that shows appellant has the

right of appeal was made part of the appellate record within thirty days of the order. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174, 175-76 (Tex. App.—San Antonio

2003, order). Appellant’s counsel filed a response in which he states he is unable to find a

justification to file an amended trial court certification in this case. In light of the record presented,

Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The record does 04-18-00796-CR

not contain a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal; to the contrary, the trial

court certification in the record states “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant

has NO right of appeal.” The clerk’s record contains a written plea bargain, and the punishment

assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the

defendant; therefore, the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that the defendant

has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Victor N. Cervantes v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-n-cervantes-v-state-texapp-2019.