Victor Mendoza v. United States

551 F. App'x 243
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 13, 2014
Docket13-50369
StatusUnpublished

This text of 551 F. App'x 243 (Victor Mendoza v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Victor Mendoza v. United States, 551 F. App'x 243 (5th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed for essentially the reasons stated in its Memorandum Opinion and Order Dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint and for the additional reason that the Complaint is a collateral attack of Plaintiffs judgment of conviction upon his plea of guilty for violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, 846 and is barred by Spina v. Aaron, 821 F.2d 1126, 1127-29 (5th Cir.1987); Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994); Stephenson v. Reno, 28 F.3d 26 (5th Cir.1994) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heck v. Humphrey
512 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1994)
Alan James Spina v. C.L. Aaron, Etc.
821 F.2d 1126 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
551 F. App'x 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-mendoza-v-united-states-ca5-2014.