Victor Mendoza v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Victor Mendoza v. United States

551 F. App'x 243

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 13, 2014·No. 13-50369·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed for essentially the reasons stated in its Memorandum Opinion and Order Dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint and for the additional reason that the Complaint is a collateral attack of Plaintiffs judgment of conviction upon his plea of guilty for violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, 846 and is barred by Spina v. Aaron, 821 F.2d 1126, 1127-29 (5th Cir.1987); Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994); Stephenson v. Reno, 28 F.3d 26 (5th Cir.1994) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed for essentially the reasons stated in its Memorandum Opinion and Order Dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint and for the additional reason that the Complaint is a collateral attack of Plaintiffs judgment of conviction upon his plea of guilty for violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, 846 and is barred by Spina v. Aaron, 821 F.2d 1126, 1127-29 (5th Cir.1987); Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994); Stephenson v. Reno, 28 F.3d 26 (5th Cir.1994) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Victor Mendoza v. United States, 551 F. App'x 243 (5th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

551 F. App'x 243 (Victor Mendoza v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related