Victor Mendoza v. United States
This text of 551 F. App'x 243 (Victor Mendoza v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed for essentially the reasons stated in its Memorandum Opinion and Order Dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint and for the additional reason that the Complaint is a collateral attack of Plaintiffs judgment of conviction upon his plea of guilty for violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841, 846 and is barred by Spina v. Aaron, 821 F.2d 1126, 1127-29 (5th Cir.1987); Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994); Stephenson v. Reno, 28 F.3d 26 (5th Cir.1994) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
551 F. App'x 243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-mendoza-v-united-states-ca5-2014.