Victor Manuel Quijano v. Maria Eugenia Amaya
This text of Victor Manuel Quijano v. Maria Eugenia Amaya (Victor Manuel Quijano v. Maria Eugenia Amaya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-16-00485-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
VICTOR MANUEL QUIJANO, Appellant,
v.
MARIA EUGENIA AMAYA, Appellee.
On appeal from the 138th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.
ORDER OF ABATEMENT Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Contreras and Benavides Order Per Curiam
Appellant Victor Manuel Quijano appeals from a “Corrected Final Decree of
Divorce” entered by the trial court on August 9, 2016. Appellant is proceeding pro se
and states he does not have the means to pay the fees and costs of the appellate record.
Appellant filed his notice of appeal on September 8, 2016. Appellant filed an affidavit of indigence with this Court on September 22, 2016 and was found to be indigent
by this Court on September 23, 2016. The clerk’s record reflects appellant filed an
affidavit of indigence with the trial court on September 23, 2016. The docketing
statement also indicated that appellant was proceeding as indigent.
Originally, the reporter’s record was due on October 11, 2016. The reporter filed
a request for extension of time to file the record on October 31, 2016 stating that appellant
had failed to request a reporter’s record and had not made arrangements for paying for
the record. Appellant provided this Court with a letter on November 10, 2016, explaining
that he had attempted but failed to contact the court reporter with regard to this.
Subsequent letters from the reporter filed with this Court also state that the reporter’s
record was not filed due to appellant not requesting it and for not making arrangements
to pay for it. A copy of the reporter’s record was never filed with this Court or provided
to appellant.
Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145 governs a party’s claim that the party is unable
to afford costs for preparation of the appellate record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145. A party
who filed a statement of inability to afford payments of court costs cannot be required to
pay costs except by order of the court. See id. R. 145(a). Costs are defined to include
“fees charged by the clerk or court reporter for preparation of the appellate record.” Id.
R. 145(c).
Here, appellant filed an affidavit of indigence with the trial court and the record
contains no order requiring appellant to pay fees for the preparation of the reporter’s
record. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and ORDER the court reporter of the 138th
2 District Court of Cameron County to prepare a reporter’s record in this proceeding (trial
court cause number 2015-DCL-07448-B), free of charge to appellant, and to file such
record with this Court within thirty days from the date of this order.
This appeal will be reinstated upon receipt of the reporter’s record and upon further
order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 16th day of January, 2018.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Victor Manuel Quijano v. Maria Eugenia Amaya, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-manuel-quijano-v-maria-eugenia-amaya-texapp-2018.