Victor M. Alvarado v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 25, 2006
Docket13-05-00571-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Victor M. Alvarado v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation (Victor M. Alvarado v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Victor M. Alvarado v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

                             NUMBER 13-05-571-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________

VICTOR M. ALVARADO, ET AL.,                               Appellants,

                                           v.

OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS

CORPORATION, ET AL.,                                           Appellees.

                  On appeal from the 319th District Court

                           of Nueces County, Texas.

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

              Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

                       Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, VICTOR M. ALVARADO, ET AL., attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause no. 98-03930-G.  The clerk=s record was received on April 28, 2006. 


Upon review of the clerk=s record, it appeared that the order from which this appeal was taken was not a final appealable order.  Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  Appellants failed to file a response as requested by this Court=s notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= failure to respond to this Court=s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 25th day of May, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Victor M. Alvarado v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/victor-m-alvarado-v-owens-corning-fiberglass-corpo-texapp-2006.